24 August 2009


Here is my say regarding the relevant aspects of the Ashes series. It's a long one, and I have taken my time to just read all the various sources out there to get an idea on the media reaction. Later in the week I will be shifting all the focus to the ODI series, and two Twenty20's.

It's disheartening to lose an Ashes series, and no doubt myself and every other Aussie supporter have been left feeling a bit bleak. But I have enough in me, as a good sport, to congratulate England on their Ashes series win.
The Baggy Green were outplayed when it mattered for us to seal the big moments, but it will be a learning experience for the guys and with further experience and personal growth for each cricketer in our team the guys will be able to capture the big moments.
Sealing momentum and not being outplayed when it matters is a big factor the guys have lost, but it's important to remember these aren't the players of the past decade and most of them have not been apart of that era and have only just emerged onto the International scene in these cut-throat contests.
I do see alot of positives but the team will get better, and will get stronger. They are all professional cricketer's who have come through some tough ranks to get to where they are.
'We'll get them next time', is what all of us who are Australian supporters will say, and yes, we will get England next time!

For this particular test, it's simple. You can carry on about the selectors, the Umpiring at times, Nathan Hauritz and Brett Lee being overlooked and the pitch, but the real reason is this. You cannot be bowled out for 160 runs in the defining Test of an Ashes series. Simple as that!
The deficit was already quite a handful, and our bowler's had a tough task to try an make that deficit seem less daunting would be a big ask after such a poor first innings. Every batsman in our team will be able to admit to this.
On this topic Stuart Broad's bizarre spell where he shredded apart our batting order and claimed 5 wickets, deserves the credit where it's due, as his man of the match award summed up his impact.
As for the series, our inability to seal the big moments for momentum was evident in the 1st Test. This team will learn their ways in functioning as a unit to achieve this, just like the Waugh era managed to do and the early stages of Ricky Ponting's Captaincy, but that 1st Test session, I'm sure you know which one I'm referring too.
I mentioned soon after that that 20th wicket we were unable to grab would come back to haunt us! And it has. It gave England a strange edge ahead of us, even though we had outplayed them in every aspect of that Test. I guess Monty Panesar didn't realise the impact his survival stint would have!

Yes it's true. Ricky Ponting is not the greatest Captain in the World or in stature for Australian cricket, but hell, look at what he's had to deal with and what a legend he is for the Baggy Green!
I think it would be safe to say that he has had alot to contend with in his capacity. People say the only reason Ricky is good is because he had a stack of world-class players in his ranks. People tend to overlook the impact his materclass batting has had on Australian cricket. How he came through at such a young age, and how he has seen alot in his time. He took over the Captaincy not only with a strong team, but a team of guys he'd been playing with for many years even before he had the Captaincy. When he was handed the Captaincy he knew his team, he knew the role each guy played, and knew how to deploy their skills.
In his time he had to see not just one or two, but a whole bunch of these heroes of The Baggy Green depart. It's not easy to be one of the few remaining guys from such an era, but Ricky was alot younger than alot of these guys and knew he'd have to brave on. And he has. He has had alot more to deal with than any other Captain in recent times has had to deal with.
At times he didn't use his knowledge to its full extent it would seem. Notably using Marcus North to bowl at the death in that first test as opposed to Ben Hilfenhaus or a bowler with a bit more to prod away at the frailty of Panesar's batting, or Anderson tendency to poke at deliveries shaping across his body. Punter opted for quantity not quality here to get the overs in, and it was a risk that didn't pay off. But I have always seen him as a really strong leader, who accepts responsibility on and off the field, and apparently really takes time out away from the game to boost his younger or less-experienced team mates.
He has alot to deal with in these circumstance and this will make him a stronger character. I think alot of people out there underestimate him, and this team still have plenty time to make a legacy of their own. Punter is a fighter, and a champ!
So why sack Ricky? Why waste time to panic and throw away a guy who may not be the best Skipper, but with little doubt in my mind is the best man for the job right now. Sure, Michael Clarke is our Vice-Captain, and will Captain our ODI team, but Brad Haddin and Simon Katich have led NSW in many encounters, Michael Hussey has had plenty Captaincy duties in his time, and Marcus North is the WA Skipper, but I cannot see any of them in a position to take over Captaincy. Punter must stay longer to ensure this team can work as an ensemble. It's very important.

Shane Watson deserves a pat on the back, while Selectors need a crack over the head! I have to feel a bit sorry for Phillip Hughes. The bloke was boosted to such extremes that any poor performances would toss him into a difficult hole to crawl his way out of. He showed weakness to the short balls, which is nothing that can't be rectified, especially from such a motivated young guy with a good strong mind. I think the panic factor here was real shock and given the circumstances, Shane Watson deserves the credit after being tossed urgently into an International situation where he had no familiarity.
Time for the selectors to seriously think about their opening order tactics and have a contigency plan with a reserve specialist batsman, before throwing out a young guy who they backed with unbreakable confidence only to put in a guy who really wanted to improve his Test career, but had to do so in really intense circumstances.

Michael Hussey is one of my favourite cricketers. Not just for the obvious being his batting (which has seen a major drop in Test cricket) but because he is such a hard working guy. He is tenacious, determined and remains a humble person true to his game. He is a great team mate from what the Australian camp say, and when he is in the groove he is a splendid cricketer to watch.
I stated somewhere along the line when the critics were calling for him to be axed, that he would get a century in the Ashes. I stated this well before the series had even started. I didn't gamble on it coming though in the final innings, at a time that was maybe a touch of magic too late. It turned out to be a career saving innings for Huss in Test cricket, but I am personally very proud of Huss and I managed to see him reach his century live on the Tele. To make a century under all the different variables is quite an achievement.
Just a pity it couldn't have been so much more, that there couldn't have been more, and that a few other guys couldn't have followed in his wake.
It's important not to forget that Huss' ODI game has been consistent and that he has alot to offer Australian cricket, and has given all of us many great memories.
I back each and every one of these guys, and while Huss' input hasn't been anywhere near as valuable as it needed to be, it was a known fact his place in the squad was being questioned, but I will never question his commitment when he puts on tha Baggy Green. The same goes for Ricky Ponting.

Michael Clarke was consistent and showed eye-opening signs on improvement when I cast my mind back to the 2005 Ashes. There was patience as he was building his innings, tactful skill in playing his shots noticeably late on the delivery, and he was able to compose himself with aggressive tendencies to launch into England's bowlers.
He missed out on an extra century, but made it to the triple figure mark on a couple of occassions. My most enjoyable innings of his to watch was his century at Lords. Sure, we lost the game and it ended up being less valuable, but he played so fluently, and his shot selection was spot on, with some classy off-side play. After managing to take a tour of Lord's when I was in England last year, and seeing that records board in the touring teams' dressing room, it makes me proud to know another Australian cricketer has their name engraved on the historical mount! It all seemed an unfortunate end to such a brilliant tour for Michael.
He stated before the game if he didn't contribute and we lost the game it would all be worthless. I think the tears he showed at the end of the 5th Test summed it up for him. It was great to see in its own way, as it shows how passionate he is to be where he is at, how badly he wanted to see us over the finish line.
I have always believed a sportsman truely proud and committed to his teams cause shows his true emotions when the appropriate moment is there.
Just a pity it couldn't have been tears of celebration for him. Next time though!

Nathan Hauritz showed guts! A battered finger, he continued to carry on and managed to give some excellent contributions. This was a sign of dedication I won't forget anytime soon, but I need to hand it to two bowlers in particular.
Ben Hilfenhaus followed a similar fate to Michael Clarke. Both of them had a big impact in the first 4 Tests, and really got under the English teams skin. Hilfy showed improvement in each match he played, and his consistency at the top of the bowling stocks proved to be so crucial when Mitchell Johnson was finding it a big struggle to play his game at the other end. Hilfy had Ravi Bopara's number right until he was dropped to make way for Ian Bell to slot in at number 3. While Hilfy didn't generate the swing we expected from him, he showed some positive signs for the future. I look forward to seeing him debut on Australian soil where he emerged as a big talking point for the Tassie Tigers in the Pura Cup, once again know as the Sheffield Shield.
Peter Siddle did what he could. He wore his heart on his sleeve and gave it the usual 100% ambition and fought for each wicket. He has alot to learn, but why be so hard on a guy who only debuted a year ago. I think of India's Ishant Sharma and how he has come along in leaps and bounds.
He took strain in the beginning and seemed little a threat to the opposition.
But with winning and losing experience, he has become a big factor to Indian cricket.
I look back to Sids' debut in India last year, where I was one of the guys who maybe came across a bit harsh on his not so threatening performances and really thought he was tossed into the International mix to soon, but he is paying off to the selectors now, and is starting to feel like he belongs there series by series. Sid Vicious is a nickname rightly earned, as I believe Sid's would have been well suited to the Australian way of cricket in the 90's. Aggressive, tenacious and prepared to go down bruised and battered to get in the batsman's face and ensure that last wicket was taken. It didn't reflect in its entire esence in this Test, but he has the foundations well in place.
Himself and Hilfy have big shoes to fill, and if the team as a whole can start working with synergy and the Selectors will actually give the team the confidence backing needed, it will boost these guys to stake their claim in Australian cricket history.

I may come across as optomistic, and maybe seem to be just another arrogant Australian supporter, but I rightly stand my ground.
I support my team through anything. I watch more than cricket as a team sport, and love Rugby Union. This is another team sport, where many teams who are at the top lose key players and find themselves in a rebuilding process. The Wallabies are in a similar phase and by the 2011 World Cup they will have a few seniors gone from the ranks. This has happened to Australian cricket and we can see the impact. But hey, if you watch anything other than cricket you will not be surprised to find that it happens to teams in all sports! Sure, very few teams have had the dominance internationally noticed that Australian cricket has had. But rebuilding means being knocked down a few levels, and gradually building back up with patience and strategic planning to ensure the foundations are strong and the rebuilding pays off.
This is where Australian cricket is at, and with this means a drop in the rankings. This has happened before and will happen again, but all the other 'extremist non-Australian supporters' out there who are all very quick to point fingers and arrogantly state that Australian cricket is going to only continue to plummet are greatly mistaken, and perhaps naive because the same thing will come their way in time and likely don't have that strong a Domestic competition to steer their side in the right direction.

One individual for England stands out. This is their Skipper Andrew Strauss. He was the one player who was consistent for them, and as an individual stood out when none of this team-mates did. He regularly made it past the fifty mark. I mentioned many times how important it was to break-up the Cook/Strauss partnership, but more and more it became the Strauss factor that carried England through some tough times. He led his team forward.
At Lord's he was flawless in his innings of 160, and England turned out to be victorious on that outing, essentially ending our historial winning reign at Lords Cricket Ground.

While we didn't win the Ashes, and I was very sure we would, it wasn't to be.
I am proud to support the boys in these testing times, and especially proud how the guys continued to show their determination and not lose hope.
But it's time to look ahead.
We have a chance to regroup now for the summer. We have two test series' against The West-Indies in the Frank-Worrell Trophy and also Pakistan. This is a good chance for the team to get back on home soil, fight on and beat these teams to gain the confidence needed to move forward and start getting things back together in the Test format, but to also start getting stronger in phasing towards the next Ashes series.

But we now have a golden opportunity to sort things out in the ODI arena with a frenzy of ODI cricket with the Remains against England, that consist of 7 ODI's and 2 Twenty20's.
After this final leg of the time in England, it's off to South Africa for the ICC Champions Trophy where we are the defending Champions from 2006, and then to wrap it up before the home series against Pakistan and The Windies, it will be time to take on India in India in a 7 match ODI series, and I really can't wait for that one for a number of reasons!
So now it's time to shift my focus away from the Ashes in it's closure, and look into the Remains as they are surely there for the taking!
So from my side, it is an unfortunate ending to the Ashes, but it is great for Test cricket none-the-less.

That's probably all the main chirps from my side regarding the 2009 Ashes, and I'd like to say thanks to all of you guys who have chipped in with your valued say and if you are an English supporter well done, if you are one of the guys on my side...we'll get 'em next time!
Also a big thanks to Chris Stocks from the Metro, London, England and his input here and also his generosity regarding some of the interviews and information he obtained from the Aussie cricketer's at my request.
Check in my links list for his column 'Extra Cover'.
He is an English supporter, but he has some great stuff at his site!

Hope to hear more from you blokes, and hopefully some positive chirps will be typed out from my keyboard as our ODI squad put on the Green and Gold gear and represent us against the old enemy.
Another first time for alot of these guys in such a series, but I will leave this article up for all of you to discuss things, and come Thursday or Friday I will have the Green and Gold squad squad spotter up for review!


Sylvester said...

When will our batters get it through their heads that the opposition has to earn their wickets not be gifted them.

I was complaining about our running between the wickets for quite some time, I think it was either the T20 WC or our last series loss against SA. We throw away too many wickets due to run outs, we would have to be one of the worst teams when it comes to this aspect.

Sadly I can't see either being fixed until we start bringing in new players, its a mentality that seems to be stuck with this generation of players. Some how even Katich has become one to throw his wicket away, he usually is so strict with not playing anything outside off stump.

Christopher Poshin David said...

Well it's end of an era mate.....................end of the Invincible Australia......

Ian said...

Was the end of an era after the 2006/07 Ashes mate.
We have been in this process ultimately since Gilchrist and Hogg called it a day.
This is part and parcel of the next era.

Sylvester, it was during the Proteas series you commented on the running between the wickets. Don't be to dismayed. We will have alot to work on to not be so cheap in throwing the moments away. This was a big turning point, for the better and worse dude. Just keep backing the boys. We are in a stage that was inevitable, and while it shouldn't be this bad, we are in our time for rebuilding...other teams will have to face the music too. Just after so long being such a great team, it is just a more evident change.

jawad said...

Ian, hope you are doing well my friend. Sorry to hear about the Ashes. I saw it slip away as Ponting and clarke were off with those suicidal runouts. were they needed? I guess Punt and Pup will be tossing and turning thinking about it for a long time now.

Blame game is inevitable. I think CA is quite respectful when it comes to not blaming a single player but they have been delusional bunch in the past 18 months. i think none of the results since, have gone Australia's way. Looking at the stats, Australia dominated throughout but as Punt mentioned, it was the important moments that were won by England. I think England were quite smart in their decision making. Bopara failed for the first four tests, they could've stuck with him for the 5th but brought in a new guy and it worked but that is just one example. Yes, it could be luck but they tried something different and it worked for them. CA selectors have stuck with the same team throughout and as history shows (SA series & Indian series) sticking with out of form players have not worked but they continue to be conservative in their decision making. It blows my mind that they still refuse to take any of the blame. The selection has been poor throughout. I think they really banked on players like Hughes, Johnson and hussey to lead the way. I think Johnson and Hussey have been their best players for a while now but when they are not doing well, why stick with them ? once again, history shows, it doesn't work! In the REAL WORLD, you haven't been doing well for the past 18 months at work. In your evaluation, you fail miserably. You are LET GO! because you just have not been performing, simple as that. Hussey has been lucky. Spare a thought for brad hodge.

I have to agree with Sylvester, there have been more then one occasion where the batsmen have thrown their wickets away. Brad haddin is a good player but in many occasions you see him play an ODI innings then a test innings, which is not good all the time. He gets out in the most pathetic ways at the most crucial times, same goes for Clarke and North. Yes, they have been good for Australia but it doesn't matter now, does it?

As Ian, mentioned, the fact of the matter is that 160 just was not enough on a decent wicket. England just played better. I don't think Australia ever showed up to defend the Ashes, to be honest with you. I did not see the same determination on their faces, when they went to SA. England did not have the stats but their players stepped up during the important moments.

As for sacking ponting? GROW UP PEOPLE! The guy may not be the best captain around and he may not have batted as well as he could have but as chappell mentioned, the previous captains did not have to deal with changes as much as Ponting has. The guy is a legend in my book because there are a number of times, when he has stepped up and showed why he is rapidly rising to be the number one scorer and yes he has an impressive record as a captain. He is the best man for the job. I don't see him continuing on if he does get sacked. I don't think Australia needs that right now. I just hope these past 18 months have been a wake up call for them. I just feel there should be changes within the CA management and selection.

Ian said...

Jawad....on the money, seems we agree upon everything.
Great input there mate. And really great to hear your opinion as always!
While it is good not tobe too deep into the blaming game, it is safe to say the last 18 months we have been talking about the selectors time and time again.
As for Brad Hodge, I had to end my defense for the man's cause because I realised the NSP have given him the middle finger a while ago, which is disaspointing. For some reason everyone still holds that ODI series in India over his head.

Better things for the ODI series I hope.

Sidthegnomenator said...

You're absolutely right, Ian, Australia are still rebuilding and yet it seemed to me that it was the more experienced players (the batsmen) who let us down ... the inexperienced bowlers did us proud, I thought.

The blame game is inevitable, sadly. I was worried Nathan Hauritz would cop it, as he was so unpopular to begin with, but it seems he is the man of the moment - he is probably glad he didn't play at the Oval, if he had and we had still lost he might just be copping it now.

I am concerned about Simon Katich, who wore it in 2005, as he seems (as Sylvester said) to keep giving his wicket away. I know Simon and could tell that he was so anxious to do well that anxiety had the opposite effect.

Ponting is the obvious choice for blame, and I do think he has made some terrible mistakes as captain (as Poshin well knows) but who is the alternative really? Also, I can't believe Ponting can carry all the blame. Everyone involved has to take some, including the selectors. Someone on the Cricket Australia page on facebook made this point:

"isn't it interesting that we always refer to Ponting losing the Ashes twice, but Australia winning 5-0 in 2007?" Good point.

Baiju Nair said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Baiju Nair said...

Nice article as always but coz it was a long one I had to break it into pieces for reading as I was reading it in the office (in between we have to do some official job also na).... :)

Jokes apart, I seriously feel that the consistency factor was really missing from this Aussie outfit. I have no doubt in my mind about the talent of each individuals in the team. How does a team that won the series against the red hot proteas in SA couldn't repeat that performance against a much lesser opponent The answer for me is not the problem with the talent but with the consistency.

Ian said...

Baiju, you are atleast patient with reading. Hell any of you guys who read it in one shot kudo's to you! Inconsistency, that has been the trend for some time now!

Sid...what was with your other post mate! I found this interesting that you stated; "I was worried Nathan Hauritz would cop it, as he was so unpopular to begin with, but it seems he is the man of the moment - he is probably glad he didn't play at the Oval, if he had and we had still lost he might just be copping it now."
The spinner dilemna will continue, and hopefully Nathan doesn't meet the same fate as the other spinners we've seen in and out.

And it's too true. Even the Pom's have forgotten about the 5-0 whitewash!!! When we lose the media digs in like vultures and the Non-Australian fans can't get enough of it...when we win, it goes surprisingly quiet usually with the CHEATER tag being used relentlessly.

Jawad, read your comment again. Good on you for what you said about Ricky as Captain, and great to see most of the blokes here all on the same supporter's page here.

Ian said...

BTW Sid, you mentioned you know Katto. Chris Stocks, a guy I chat to who writes for the Metro in London had Katto writing articles for them throughout the Ashes. His last post was very well written, and similar to what we have all said. Good to know we are on the same page as our team. I will put up the link sometime soon when I get it from Chris.

jawad said...

Read the new article on Pontings new press conference. It seems like he is willing to split the captaincy. I think it is a great idea! He never really made a big impact as a T20 player. He is also willing to stay on if he does get sacked as a test captain, which i just don't agree upon but who knows what the cricket gods are thinking, maybe it will be good for the team? I just feel clarke is not ready to be a test captain yet. I say give him the T20 for now and ODI captaincy after the world cup. It would be nice to see Ponting go for WC win one last time as captain.